Advocacy in International Commercial Arbitration offers authoritative commentary indispensable to the working arbitration professional. This volume of the ASA Special Series is a continuation of ASA's efforts in identifying and promoting efficient advocacy in international arbitration. Some of the topics covered:
--Elliott Geisinger's contribution to this volume entitled Advocacy in International Commercial Arbitration: What For?, explores the principle of advocacy as an area where any improvement will directly serve clients as well as the arbitral process, asks whether these principles are as widely observed as they are recognized, and warns of the dangers lying beneath the surface of what many consider to be "best" practices.
--Professor Waincymer’s enlightened contribution on the training of advocates, are set out in his chapter entitled Advocacy Training of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration.
--Matt Gearing and Sheila Ahuja make clear in their article entitled Professional Conduct in International Arbitration--A Discipline of Its Own for a Discipline of Its Kind, that advocacy is shaped by the complex professional constraints in which counsel from various jurisdictions evolve.
--Elliott Geisinger's contribution to this volume entitled Advocacy in International Commercial Arbitration: What For?, explores the principle of advocacy as an area where any improvement will directly serve clients as well as the arbitral process, asks whether these principles are as widely observed as they are recognized, and warns of the dangers lying beneath the surface of what many consider to be "best" practices.
--Professor Waincymer’s enlightened contribution on the training of advocates, are set out in his chapter entitled Advocacy Training of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration.
--Matt Gearing and Sheila Ahuja make clear in their article entitled Professional Conduct in International Arbitration--A Discipline of Its Own for a Discipline of Its Kind, that advocacy is shaped by the complex professional constraints in which counsel from various jurisdictions evolve.
