History: Fiction or Science? is the most explosive tractate
on history ever written – however, every theory
it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by
solid scientific data.
The book contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies
of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting
to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays,which
never cease to amaze the reader.
Eminent mathematician proves that:
Does this sound uncanny? This version of events is
substantiated by hard facts and logic, validated by
new astronomical research and statistical analysis of
ancient sources – to a greater extent than everything
you may have read and heard about history before.
The dominating historical discourse in its current
state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from
a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable
copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts
whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages
and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval
astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial
authorities. Nearly all of its components are
blatantly untrue!
For some of us, it shall possibly be quite disturbing
to see the magnificent edifice of classical history turn
into an ominous simulacrum brooding over the snake
pit of mediaeval politics. Twice so, in fact: the first
time, the legendary millenarian dust on the ancient
marble turn into a mere layer of dirt – one that meticulous
unprejudiced research can eventually remove.
The second, and greater, attack of unease comes with
the awareness of just how many areas of human
knowledge still trust the three elephants of the consensual
chronology to support them. Nothing can
remedy that except for an individual chronological
revolution happening in the minds of a large enough
number of people.
on history ever written – however, every theory
it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by
solid scientific data.
The book contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies
of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting
to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays,which
never cease to amaze the reader.
Eminent mathematician proves that:
Does this sound uncanny? This version of events is
substantiated by hard facts and logic, validated by
new astronomical research and statistical analysis of
ancient sources – to a greater extent than everything
you may have read and heard about history before.
The dominating historical discourse in its current
state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from
a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable
copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts
whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages
and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval
astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial
authorities. Nearly all of its components are
blatantly untrue!
For some of us, it shall possibly be quite disturbing
to see the magnificent edifice of classical history turn
into an ominous simulacrum brooding over the snake
pit of mediaeval politics. Twice so, in fact: the first
time, the legendary millenarian dust on the ancient
marble turn into a mere layer of dirt – one that meticulous
unprejudiced research can eventually remove.
The second, and greater, attack of unease comes with
the awareness of just how many areas of human
knowledge still trust the three elephants of the consensual
chronology to support them. Nothing can
remedy that except for an individual chronological
revolution happening in the minds of a large enough
number of people.
