Half of the cure in Homeopathy, is to choose, the each time, most similar to the patient, homeopathic remedy. The other half, is to follow closely the patient’s course, interpret correctly his ups and downs, his, each time needs, and interfere, when needed, in the most correct way.
In the same way that the Classical Miasmatic Constitutional Homeopathy, developed by the author, employs strict laws in order to reach a correct diagnosis, in the same way it employs strict laws in treatment. The Homeopathic Laws provide the doctor with the necessary strict criteria in order to judge, objectively, how the patient responded to the treatment (Follow up) and what he must now do (Second Prescription).
This book about the incidents during the homeopathic treatment, gives valuable answers to critical questions like the following: “What do I do when the patient is the same or worse after the first prescription?” “Are there any kind of side-effects in Homeopathy?” “What are the strict criteria in order to decide whether an aggravation of the patient’s condition is, indeed, a Therapeutic Aggravation?”
“What is a Pharmaceutical Proving? How can it take place and how must it be dealt with?” “How do I choose the correct potency of the homeopathic remedy?” “How do I deal with Acute Illnesses that appear during the course of a chronic homeopathic treatment?” “Can Homeopathy be combined with other treatments?” “When do I employ a Parallel Treatment?” “Why must, a homeopath, definitely, be a medical doctor?”
In the same way that the Classical Miasmatic Constitutional Homeopathy, developed by the author, employs strict laws in order to reach a correct diagnosis, in the same way it employs strict laws in treatment. The Homeopathic Laws provide the doctor with the necessary strict criteria in order to judge, objectively, how the patient responded to the treatment (Follow up) and what he must now do (Second Prescription).
This book about the incidents during the homeopathic treatment, gives valuable answers to critical questions like the following: “What do I do when the patient is the same or worse after the first prescription?” “Are there any kind of side-effects in Homeopathy?” “What are the strict criteria in order to decide whether an aggravation of the patient’s condition is, indeed, a Therapeutic Aggravation?”
“What is a Pharmaceutical Proving? How can it take place and how must it be dealt with?” “How do I choose the correct potency of the homeopathic remedy?” “How do I deal with Acute Illnesses that appear during the course of a chronic homeopathic treatment?” “Can Homeopathy be combined with other treatments?” “When do I employ a Parallel Treatment?” “Why must, a homeopath, definitely, be a medical doctor?”
