Liberation Theology in contrast to traditional theological systems and traditions focuses on orthopraxis (right practice) rather than orthodoxy (right belief); as such it is activistic in its outlook and practice. Theologies of Liberation are characterized by a strong emphasis on divine immanence, in part as a reaction against Neoorthodoxy’s radical emphasis on divine transcendence. These theologies focus on rectifying the concrete realities of oppression rather than on human sin and redemption, and they see the task of theology as the overthrow of oppressive structures—if necessary, according to some, even by means of violent revolution. The practical impulse for the development of Liberation Theology as a movement was the reality of human oppression, specifically the widespread economic oppression in Latin America. It has spread throughout the world with a focus on rectifying various forms of oppression as opposed to focusing on the need for human redemption from sin and reconciliation with God. In America Liberation Theology has been most prominently seen in Black Theology and Feminist Theology.
This essay surveys the roots of Liberation Theology, both intellectual and social, its methods, major figures and subtypes as well as offering a critique of some of its weaknesses.
This essay surveys the roots of Liberation Theology, both intellectual and social, its methods, major figures and subtypes as well as offering a critique of some of its weaknesses.
