The genius of the wee Doctor behind the electronic voice on trial?
Stephen Hawking's influence in cosmology is significant.
Why put him on trial?
The public has a right to investigate Dr. Hawking's Grand Design theory about the origin of the universe.
Evaluating a theory is the foundation of the scientific method.
All research must stand up to exacting scrutiny.
Now bestselling author, Pierre St. Clair, extracts science fact from social fantasy via the judgement of 64 renowned physicists.
This book uncovers a widespread turmoil in astrophysics
“Theoretical physics is at a crossroads right now…In a sense we’ve entered a very deep crisis.”
Dr. Neil Turok – Director of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through
equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality."
Nikola Tesla
"Stephen Hawking On Trial is compelling reading for anyone with an interest in physics and cosmology. It may challenge your beliefs, or maybe not, but it's a fascinating read in either case."
J. Chambers – Amazon Top 10 Reviewer
Society doesn’t thrive on uncertainty. Does Hawking's latest theory eliminate uncertainty?
Evidence must be beyond a reasonable doubt – the rationale logical people and jurors use to settle an issue.
Unbiased investigators have a right to challenge: “Let’s look at the evidence.”
"I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned."
Dr. Richard Feynman – eminent physicist
"This is the first book that has assembled the origins of cosmology as evidence like opposing counsels. Readers can weigh testimonies as a judge who demands rigorous arguments and proofs. St. Clair has the detached presence of mind to act as both scales of justice."
D. M. Shapiro – Los Angeles filmmaker
Author St. Clair's in-depth analysis of Hawking’s Grand Design theory reveals:
• What we factually know and, more importantly, what we do not know about the universe
• The one question that is never asked but deserves an answer
• Why hypotheses with no supportive data are presented as relevant theories
Gravity is the most common force in nature
Stephen Hawking On Trial challenges physicists who misapply gravitation to unjustifiably support and promote ideas as genuine theory despite a lack of contributory data.
"Hawking and a few others are doing a disservice to science by exaggerating what we know and therein confusing the public. This book sets the record straight."
D. Friedmann – Canadian author
NASA physicists admit that dark matter and dark energy are unknown factors, yet together they comprise 96% of the universe.
Although physicists admit they only understand 4% of the universe, Professor Hawking declares on a national TV broadcast, “The scientific account is complete."
Can any scientific account of the cosmos be complete if we only understand 4% of the universe?
Stephen Hawking portrays his ideas of the universe as scientific and supported by evidence
but in reality they are mostly clouds of caveats and probabilities.
Therefore, we have legitimate cause for his ideas to stand trial.
“As a scientist and as an educator, I like the idea that we believe things because there’s evidence.” Dr. Richard Dawkins – Oxford University Professor & Bestselling Author
"This is the best Science book that I’ve read in quite a while. A Science book that views Hawking’s work and statements critically in a clear concise manner. I’ve been aware of the criticisms of Hawking’s work... "
H. Lipman – American author
BONUS: Videos explaining principles of Quantum Mechanics (particle entanglement & the double slit experiment) included with the book
Please click the orange Buy Now button to download your copy at a discount
