THE IPCC: A SCIENTIFIC BODY?
Resolutely against the grain, the author of this essay claims that the IPCC
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a fraud consisting in presenting
an essentially political initiative as scientifi c, and that this fraud is the greatest
in modern science due to its blinding and planetary success.
The essay also reads as an audacious lesson in rigor imparted by philosophy to
science. The author suggests that the debate within the IPCC, which deals with
the exact sciences, be distinguished from the debate on the IPCC, which is of
an epistemological nature, that is to say institutional, logical, methodological.
“This absolutely remarkable text is exactly what was lacking in the debate
on the IPCC.” Henri Lepage, economist
“A very interesting essay, particularly the analysis of the IPCC’s composition
and the misuse of the term Science.” Guy Sorman, essayist
“This text is an absolute delight, a perfect analysis of logic and of the motivations
behind the scientifi c-political confusion and the tremendous mystifi cation that
followed” Henri Atlan, biologist and philosopher
“This essay is a brilliant exercise in mental hygiene and public health.”
Mark Eyskens, former Belgian Prime Minister
“This book is excellent, very interesting and very important from a sociological
standpoint.” Claude Allègre, scientist, former French Minister of National Education
“Drieu Godefridi’s book is one of the most relevant publications I have read
in these last few years. The great force of this excellent book is its brilliant
defense of a provocative thesis in a perfectly balanced way.”
Corentin de Salle, philosopher
Drieu Godefridi is a jurist and doctor of philosophy (Paris IV-Sorbonne)
and recently the author of Le droit public (2009), “Arbitraire et droit dans
l’Athènes antique” (Folia Electronica Classica, 2010) and La réalité augmentée
Resolutely against the grain, the author of this essay claims that the IPCC
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a fraud consisting in presenting
an essentially political initiative as scientifi c, and that this fraud is the greatest
in modern science due to its blinding and planetary success.
The essay also reads as an audacious lesson in rigor imparted by philosophy to
science. The author suggests that the debate within the IPCC, which deals with
the exact sciences, be distinguished from the debate on the IPCC, which is of
an epistemological nature, that is to say institutional, logical, methodological.
“This absolutely remarkable text is exactly what was lacking in the debate
on the IPCC.” Henri Lepage, economist
“A very interesting essay, particularly the analysis of the IPCC’s composition
and the misuse of the term Science.” Guy Sorman, essayist
“This text is an absolute delight, a perfect analysis of logic and of the motivations
behind the scientifi c-political confusion and the tremendous mystifi cation that
followed” Henri Atlan, biologist and philosopher
“This essay is a brilliant exercise in mental hygiene and public health.”
Mark Eyskens, former Belgian Prime Minister
“This book is excellent, very interesting and very important from a sociological
standpoint.” Claude Allègre, scientist, former French Minister of National Education
“Drieu Godefridi’s book is one of the most relevant publications I have read
in these last few years. The great force of this excellent book is its brilliant
defense of a provocative thesis in a perfectly balanced way.”
Corentin de Salle, philosopher
Drieu Godefridi is a jurist and doctor of philosophy (Paris IV-Sorbonne)
and recently the author of Le droit public (2009), “Arbitraire et droit dans
l’Athènes antique” (Folia Electronica Classica, 2010) and La réalité augmentée
